Hall Art Foundation Presents a Survey of Works by Late Painter Susan Rothenberg | Art Review | Seven Days

click to enlarge "Algarve" - COURTESY

When Susan Rothenberg died in 2020 at the age of 75, the New Yorker art critic Peter Schjeldahl noted that the groundbreaking artist had yet to receive a major museum retrospective.

Perhaps such an exhibit is still to come. Meanwhile, Rothenberg fans can visit the Hall Art Foundation in Reading to see a survey of nearly 30 paintings and drawings spanning her career from 1974 to 2012. Most of the works come from the foundation’s collection, with some loaned by Sperone Westwater, Rothenberg’s New York City gallery for 33 years, and other sources.

Titled simply “Susan Rothenberg,” the exhibit first appeared at Kunstmuseum Schloss Derneburg, a 1,000-year-old castle in northern Germany that Andy and Christine Hall rehabilitated to show art owned by them and their foundation. (They likewise refurbished the Vermont venue, a former dairy and horse farm.) Maryse Brand organized the Derneburg exhibition in collaboration with Rothenberg and the Halls for a 2020 opening. Delayed by the pandemic, that show came to fruition in 2021, too late for the artist to see.

click to enlarge "Elizabeth" - COURTESY

Rothenberg was “an artist’s artist,” said Brand, who worked at Sperone Westwater for eight years before moving to the Hall in 2005. During a recent tour of the Reading exhibit, Brand said she received a “flurry of positive feedback” from artists grateful for the show.

Born in Buffalo, N.Y., Rothenberg earned a degree in fine arts at Cornell University in 1967 before moving to New York City. There, she shocked the art world by reintroducing figuration at a time when minimalist and conceptual art reigned and painting had been declared dead.

In a moment that Schjeldahl described as having an “asteroidal impact,” Rothenberg showed three paintings featuring monumental horses at a SoHo gallery in 1975. The Hall show includes one of them, “Algarve,” a 112-by-110-inch canvas in acrylic and tempera.

click to enlarge "Olive" - COURTESY

The painting depicts the front half of a horse in profile, outlined in black on an abstract background of muddled grayish whites. In an illusionistic touch, one of its two hooves oversteps the bottom edge of the canvas. Yet black triangles under the neck and leg and a continuation of the background inside the horse’s outline flatten the image, creating a strange straddling of abstraction and figuration.

Rothenberg’s horses are understood to function as stand-ins for the human figure; by her own admission, she cared nothing about horses or horse paintings. (Ironically, her second husband, artist Bruce Nauman, balances his artistic life with training and selling horses.) But the presence of the powerful animal in her work nevertheless introduced emotion — something deliberately withheld in, say, Donald Judd’s boxes, Agnes Martin’s grids or Frank Stella’s pinstripe paintings.

“Algarve” is the apt centerpiece in the Hall’s horse barn gallery, which shows Rothenberg’s work up to 1990. That’s the year she relocated to Galisteo, N.M., to live with Nauman in a house the couple had designed for themselves. Dark and gray-white tones dominate the earlier, urban paintings — a palette, Rothenberg has commented, that also reflected the struggle of her 1979 divorce from sculptor George Trakas, with whom she had a daughter in 1972.

click to enlarge "Pecos Pink" - COURTESY

Her 1980s paintings aren’t just dark; they’re textured. Rothenberg switched to oils during this period on the advice of her artist friend Elizabeth Murray. “Elizabeth” (1984-85) is a portrait of a half-nude Murray rendered in an explosion of brushstrokes that unite the figure with her similarly painted background.

Rothenberg also painted, in 1985, a series of portraits of Piet Mondrian; the Hall show includes “A Golden Moment,” whose layered backstory can be accessed via QR codes on the sole wall label in each building. But the painting of Murray is particularly significant: One of the few acclaimed female artists of her era, Rothenberg helped promote other women in the profession.

In a 1984 interview with the New York Times, she recalled, “I got sick of people saying, ‘How does it feel to be the only woman in the show?’ And I would reply, ‘It feels lousy, it’s not fair.’ Finally, I said, ‘If I’m the only woman, I won’t be in it.'” (Alas, Rothenberg is surrounded by men at the Hall: Two other exhibitions feature Andy Warhol and Ron Gorchov.)

click to enlarge "Boodis and Kiggy" - COURTESY

  • Courtesy
  • “Boodis and Kiggy”

In the Hall’s cow barn, 18 large works represent the last 30 years of Rothenberg’s life. Living in the Southwest changed her color palette. She dove into reds and greens, albeit muddled rather than straight from the tube. And she continued fearlessly to disregard both artistic convention and the confines of the canvas. Rothenberg’s figures, both human and animal, are occasionally inscrutable and often merely suggested by a few discreet body parts.

“I’ve never felt comfortable painting a complete figure,” the artist said in a 2005 episode of Art21’s “Art in the Twenty-First Century” on PBS. “I don’t want to get too literal about things; I want the viewer to be able to do the work, too.”

In “Boodis and Kiggy,” a 58.75-by-61-inch painting, a reddish-purple human arm and leg followed by a dog with nose to the ground crowd the left and bottom sides of the canvas. The marching pair seem not to notice the prairie dog-like figure confronting them, an arrangement that suggests a layering of perspectives to make a story. “Dog and Snake” portrays the animals’ confrontation in body fragments amid an abstract swath of yellows.

click to enlarge "The Master" - COURTESY

One late series is based on fragmented marionettes or prosthetics, including “The Master,” in which a pair of isolated yellow arms and a floating yellow face manipulate various jointed limbs. The motion of the “master” is conveyed through repetition: One of the yellow arms appears twice. As in “Boodis and Kiggy,” a good portion of the canvas is a textured void; meanwhile, its top edge abruptly cuts off some fingers and limbs.

What seems to interest Rothenberg in these paintings is how color and perspective can be used to explore sometimes opaque personal moments. “Blue Flash” is a 68-by-77-inch canvas covered in a dirty white; its upper half contains two sections of a brown body, as if it were partly submerged in the white background. A blue line extends from near one eye. Brand confirmed that the figure has been interpreted to represent Nauman, but the blue flash could be anything: a sudden insight, a flash of pain.

Rothenberg stated in another Art21 episode, “I think I care about beauty, but I don’t go for it.”

Many of the works at the Hall contain a kind of beauty, certainly of color. Something else is at work, though, in the way Rothenberg’s compositions transcend the strictures of the rectangular canvas and viewers’ expectations of perspective. She called that something “truth — some kind of truth about some kind of thing.” That, perhaps, has its own kind of beauty.

Source link

What do you think?

Written by Sharecaster

Will the U.S. Ban TikTok?

Iron Mountain entertainment complex adds drone course to RC offerings